Human Diet

How can a day look beautiful on a free diet

Breakfast: goat yogurt with various fruits. I really like plantains baked with blueberries but it doesn’t really matter what fruit.

Lunch: steak or fish.

Dinner: flat bread with avocado.

Are they all wrong?

Everyone, and I mean literally everyone, is looking for the chemistry of the body and from there trying to figure out if the food is healthy for us? For example, the oil has omega 6, so it is healthy. With free thought we approach the problem from “the end”, did humans eat it and in what form? From a logical point of view, the body developed according to what they ate, so this is a question that shatters the existing stupid theories or the really difficult ways to decipher the chemistry and biology of the body, a big gain with little effort.

And yes, everyone is definitely wrong, once everyone also thought that the earth was flat or that wooden statues brought victory in wars, even today people believe that amulets are healing. Chimpanzees eat meat and fruit and die for honey. This. I didn’t hear it, I saw it in a nature film about chimpanzees and then I checked and read that it is indeed their diet. The ” Hawk Law ” works perfectly here.

Yes, everyone makes mistakes. I have different conclusions, but they worked like crazy for me and my family. If you want to know why vegetables are trash, read to the end. A close friend told me I might live to be 120, but he enjoys me a lot more today. I didn’t respond because this bickering annoyed me, I admit. He didn’t get the idea. The idea is not to live to the age of 120, the idea is to feel great all the time, peak energy and concentration, without doctors or all the poison that overwhelms us in the western diet, to feel like a shell today and not at the age of 90. And why is everyone wrong? Because there is one way to reach an appropriate diet and that is through evolution and anthropology with a massive use of logic, that is – free thought. It’s a matter of choosing the path and not wisdom. Everything we heard or grew up with must be ignored. It is very difficult and few are able to do it. It’s easy for me because it’s natural for me to think freely. Understanding nutrition through biology or science alone leads to a dead end. A few years ago it was difficult to get concentrated and reliable information about nutrition, today it is possible with the help of Google, ChatGPT audible and Amazon books. Most diets show improvement because they cut out processed food, but that’s not enough. The problem is that the re-nutrition from the food we eat sometimes takes decades, and then it is difficult to understand what caused the problem. The poisoning is very slow.

At every meal, carbohydrate, protein and fat?

Just the opposite. This is perhaps the most critical principle in a free diet to separate carbohydrates from everything else. This is exactly what dieters tell without any understanding of evolution or the mechanisms of the body. They just recite it because it “sounds” good.

It is very important as far as possible to separate “carbohydrates” from “fats and proteins” at each meal. It is true that everything has all three, but usually in small percentages.

Carbohydrates for example are bread, fruit (except avocado), honey, yogurt, milk and the like.

Proteins and fats for example: anything from animals (except honey, milk and yogurt) as well as vegetable oil.

We will always check both calculation methods: does evolution support this method and is it possible to prove it from a biological point of view. Both support the separation of carbohydrates from protein and fat.

From an evolutionary point of view, they either ate meat and fish or ate fruit, rarely were they consumed together. They didn’t hunt a zebra and then find a potato in the area and eat them both.

Biologically (metabolically), the body knows how to convert proteins and fat into energy, but this is prevented when blood sugar is high, exactly what carbohydrates do. Don’t believe? Buy a continuous glucose meter like I did and see.

Free nutrition

A free diet that includes eating meat, fish, dairy products (fermented and goat) and fermented grains (without plant toxins , mainly wheat products), works wonders mainly by separating carbohydrates from proteins and fats, in human nature they are hardly consumed together. The great wonder that escapes logic is toxins found mainly in vegetables, roots, leaves, grains, seeds, vegetables and seeds but also unripe fruits or the kind that are not suitable for humans. Plants “don’t want” us to eat them, and unlike animals that can run away, their way of preventing this is poisons. Most toxins are found in the peel, kernels and seeds, so chewing fruit and vegetable seeds causes the toxins to be released. The fruit wants you to eat it, but not to destroy the seeds by chewing them. Chewing an almond, for example , releases some cyanide . The plant stores cyanide in an inactive form called a cyanogenic glycoside, which is basically a sugar molecule with a cyanide group attached to it through a triple bond between carbon and nitrogen. This glycoside is stored in a compartment separate from the enzyme that activates it. When an animal chews the plant, the cells are crushed, and the two chemicals mix. The enzyme then cleaves the cyanide from the sugar and releases the toxic compound. This process is similar to breaking a glow stick to mix the chemicals that make it glow. Therefore, according to the types of seeds, it is possible to understand to which animals the type of fruit has adapted itself through evolution. The seeds of blueberries and their ilk are small seeds, quite obviously intended for birds, and when humans chew them, the seeds are destroyed. Avocados, for example, are suitable for us because their kernels are large and the skin is clear, so you can easily avoid eating them. Most people have a metabolic disease that can be cured by switching to a free diet for at least a year.

There is no such thing as sensitivity

The jump in my understanding happened when I read an article that says that the number of celiac patients in the world is increasing. Celiac patients get severe symptoms when they eat products with gluten. Gluten is a toxin of the wheat family that should prevent various insects and pests from eating the wheat seeds. What seems illogical to me is that humanity suddenly develops a problem for a certain element, it has no probabilistic and non-evolutionary logic. something has to change. Indeed something has changed.

First of all, the big seed companies increased the amount of gluten in the wheat seeds by breeding and genetic engineering and thus the productivity of the farmers in the field increased because fewer pests damage the wheat. Indeed , since the 1970s, we see an increase in the yield of grains per acre more than 3 times. Although this is not only due to an increase in gluten, it has a huge effect that can explain the increase in celiac disease.

Secondly, the consumption of wheat products, such as bread, pasta and pastries, is also on the rise, and today we see that many people eat wheat products for breakfast, lunch and dinner.

The free thought came in when it didn’t make sense to me that only a small part of people are sensitive to gluten, celiac patients are 1% of the population and there are another 10% who are defined as “sensitive to gluten”. It seems much more likely to me that gluten is not good for anyone but some people with severe symptoms and some without symptoms. As I read more about it, it all came together. It turned out to me that gluten is a toxin of the wheat and that leavening reduces the amount of gluten. I remembered that I read in the Bible that during Passover you don’t eat leaven, that is, all year long they left the wheat to reduce the amount of toxins. There is a good reason they missed the wheat all year, it was not a religious ceremony. They probably realized that this way their stomachs don’t hurt. And then it all came together – science, logic and evolutionary reason. There is no such thing as gluten sensitivity, because gluten is not good for anyone, even if in varying degrees.

I remembered that when I was in Curacao, an island in the Caribbean, I saw that all the locals on the island were huge people which is a gentle word for heavy. The reason for this is that they were exposed to wheat and vegetable oil for a few years compared to the white person, and therefore they react much harder than the white person to the Western diet. The white man underwent a kind of natural selection for this diet.

Now you can go one step further in thinking and generalize with exceptions. The foods that some people are sensitive to are most likely toxic to everyone but to levels that are hardly seen, but over the course of years they cause enormous damage to humanity. And this is exactly free thought at its best.

And these are the list of foods that many people are sensitive to and are not good for anyone: wheat, vegetable oil (heartburn), peanuts, cow’s milk (stomach aches), industrial eggs, sugar (diabetics). Crohn’s and colitis in my opinion are other symptoms of increased sensitivity to food that is not suitable for humans. A change to a free diet will result, and this is my bet, in the disappearance of these diseases.

Bread, leavened and not wheat, a human heart will feast

I deliberately start with what is yes, and no – with what is not, because the response is usually “there is nothing left to eat”. “From your colonies you shall bring bread…leaven you shall turn” Leviticus, 23 “And the people carried their dough, before it was leavened; “The rest of them are bound in their dress, on their shoulders,” Exodus, 12. The bread was so important to them that they went with the dough on them.

I am not writing in a religious context, but to show how important it was once and that today everyone has forgotten about it. Biologically, fermentation breaks down the toxins in the grains to prevent pests from eating them. These toxins act on humans for years until diseases appear. The earliest archaeological evidence of baking bread and the use of sourdough is found in northeastern Jordan and dates back to 16,000 years before our time, that is, about 4,000 years before the wheat culture. The flour of these breads was composed mainly of wild wheat.

Tef bread – the most recommended of the grains for making pita bread. As the Ethiopians prepare today and have prepared in the past, only by marinating with water. It is very easy to make yourself. It’s not just that the Ethiopians are a handsome people. Put flour and water only for two days outside. After two days you can make fresh bread from it every day. Requires heating for 25 minutes at 180 degrees. When adding flour to sourdough, it is better to wait a day for the flour to ferment. You should always leave part of the flour leavened and then the leavening action happens quickly with the new flour. The teff is a small grain. When I exercise free thought, it makes more sense that seeds that have huge amounts of them would be less toxic than larger seeds. Because when there are millions of individuals, each individual has a relatively small chance of survival, so there is no need to poison all the grains like a large grain of wheat for example. You see it in fish eggs, the chance of an egg surviving is very small, but there are thousands of them, and although the egg is very vulnerable, culture is possible because of the huge amount of fish eggs. As mentioned, this is a gamble and not a scientific theory.

Like most things in nature, the use of grains for food was gradual. This study explains why it is important to soak and soak grains. Spelled, barley, rye are all similar to wheat and are very problematic because of the genetic change that has been made in them over the years and the toxins in them, such as gluten and agglutinin designed to prevent animals from eating the wheat kernels.

Humans have undergone selection (evolution) to adapt to breads, but not fully because these breads kill us slowly (especially when we don’t miss them) and kill us at older ages so there is no evolutionary adaptation. The breads of the past were leavened, we also know this according to the Jewish tradition because on Passover they do not eat leaven and from this we can conclude quite safely that during the rest of the year they ate leaven, and they did not eat leaven because of the taste but so that it would be easily digested.

Just like smoking, it is known to kill and humans have smoked for thousands of years (tobacco and the like) but smoking kills at relatively older ages so there is really no evolutionary selection force.

The problem with grains is that they are from plants, so they have toxins to prevent pests from eating them. These toxins cause many autoimmune diseases. Acidification neutralizes a large part of the toxins. Note that there are almost no sourdough breads in supermarkets (unfortunately).

Grains naturally contain toxins to prevent pests from eating them. Genetic and manual enhancement amplifies the toxins,

Toxins help the seed companies’ goal – more yield per acre, because pests don’t eat the wheat when it has a lot of toxins.

It is recommended to completely avoid all wheat products – wheat is bursting with toxins such as agglutinin and gluten and also because of the genetic improvement they did to it. Therefore, it is better to completely avoid bread, pasta and snacks.

Reasons to avoid wheat products completely:

• Teff is much easier to prepare and pickle and also tastier.
• Wheat has undergone genetic modification and conventional breeding to increase the amount of yield in the field. In practice, they increased the amount of natural toxins in wheat, the same toxins that harm pests but also poison humans.
• In wheat there is gluten (a toxin) that damages the intestinal function in all people, but especially in celiac patients.
• Wheat contains substances (toxins) that damage the body’s sugar regulation mechanism.
• Wheat contains substances that harm the feeling of hunger and metabolism.
• In regular bread that you buy: the flour has not been acidified, vegetable oil has been added which is just as toxic as wheat, sugar, salt and sometimes they sin by adding gluten (a toxin called lectin).
• Toxins in wheat that damage the body’s fat storage mechanism. This is exactly the reason why cattle are given wheat and grains – so that they get fat.

Ripe fruits with a little fructose – yes

Avocado – yes

Apricot – yes

Clementines – yes

Bananas – yes

Plantain (cooked) – yes

We are attracted to sweets not because they are high in calories, as is commonly believed, since fat actually contains more calories than sugar. Instead, in nature, sweetness is a symbol of non-toxicity. Fruits become sweet only after they are ripe, which indicates that they are safe to eat. However, it is important to choose fruits that neutralize toxins and produce sweetness. Note that each fruit adapted itself before captivity to a specific animal or to several animals. From here you can also understand if the fruit is suitable for us or not and when.

Why the fruits with a lot of fructose?

The fructose content in modern domesticated fruits is usually higher than in their wild counterparts (humans have of course adapted to the wild fruits). This is due to several factors:

• Selective breeding: For generations, humans have selectively bred fruit to be bigger, sweeter and tastier. This led to an increase in sugar content, including fructose, in many cultivated fruits compared to their wild ancestors.
• Farming practices: Modern farming techniques, incorporating the use of fertilizers, pesticides and irrigation, have allowed for more consistent and abundant fruit production. These methods can contribute to an increase in fruit size and sugar content, including fructose.
• Genetic modification: In some cases, the fruits have been genetically modified to improve specific characteristics, such as sweetness or size. This can lead to a higher fructose content in the genetically modified varieties compared to their wild relatives.
• Ripening and storage: The fruits are often picked when they are not fully ripe and then ripened during transport or storage. This can lead to a different sugar profile, including higher fructose levels, compared to fruits that ripen naturally on the plant.

In the hundreds of thousands of years of evolution we were exposed to little fructose, hence the problem. For those who suffer from a fructose digestion problem, it is recommended to eat fruit with yogurt or fermented milk products because they contain intestinal bacteria that help break down fructose as well (Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus).

The science of the fruits

Certain ripe fruits are the oldest food for humans and apes. Humans have evolved to be able to consume and digest a wide variety of foods, including fruit and other sources of fructose. However, it is worth noting that the human diet and environment have changed significantly over time, and the modern diet contains much higher levels of fructose than what was consumed by our ancestors. There is fructose in fruits and science shows (contrary to logic) that high concentrations of fructose are not healthy for us. There is an enzyme called proctorins or absorption assistant Glut5 which in some people is produced less over the years and can lead to digestive problems of many fruits. There are many studies on fructose and its effects on human health. Here are some key findings:

• Excessive consumption of fructose, especially in the form of added sugars in processed foods and beverages, has been linked to an increased risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes and other metabolic disorders. Fructose is metabolized differently than glucose and can lead to increased insulin resistance and increased blood sugar levels, especially when consumed in large amounts.
• Some studies suggest that fructose consumption may increase the risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), a condition in which fat builds up in the liver and can lead to liver damage. High levels of fructose consumption have been linked to increased inflammation and oxidative stress in the body that can contribute to the development of chronic diseases.
• Some studies have suggested that consuming fructose in the form of whole fruit may be less harmful than consuming it in the form of added sugars as the fiber and other nutrients present in whole fruit may help reduce some of the negative effects of fructose.

specific fruits

If we eat enough of them, most fruits in the wild will kill us. A very small part of the fruits in nature are suitable for human consumption. The common mistake is to think that a certain fruit is good for us when we see it in the supermarket, it does look ripe, but that’s only because its taste and appearance are good because it was picked from the unripe (unripe) tree and cooked with ethylene gas or in another unnatural way. The ripe and slightly “rotten” fruits are better for us than the “perfect” fruits that were not eaten by various pests and were picked unripe. The toxins (mainly in the peel and seeds) in the unripe can cause inflammation of the appendix and a host of other problems.

Fruits that are picked when they are relatively ripe and therefore safe: blueberries, wild strawberries, cranberries, avocados, pineapples, oranges, tangerines, lemons, red grapes.

Climacteric fruits that are usually cooked with ethylene gas and therefore recommended to be avoided (unless picked ripe from the tree): watermelon, melon, mango, peach, figs, plum, kiwi, banana, lychee and others.

In unripe fruits, heating and cooking will lower the toxins, but will not increase them. It is recommended not to eat the peel of the fruit and not to chew the seeds, note that fruit seeds have a bitter taste because they are poisonous to us.

It is recommended to eat fruits where the seed is identified and not chewed, such as avocados, cooked or baked plantain bananas (they should be ripe first).

There is nothing to worry about overripe fruits, that’s exactly why humans developed the ability to break down alcohol, a byproduct of ripe fruits. It also shows that we are adapted to eating ripe and even slightly rotten fruits!

Bottom Line Humans are adapted to eat sweet ripe fruits with a tendency to rot (exactly the opposite of the beautiful unripe fruits sold to us in the supermarket).

Honey – yes

Honey (unprocessed), like milk, is meant for eating (by the bees) and contains no toxins. From ancient times it was used to heal wounds (in my experience works better than iodine).

Eggs – yes and no

I would completely avoid chicken eggs for the following reasons (unless the chicken eats insects and its food is natural and free range):

• Eggs cause various symptoms and sensitivities for many people. There is usually a reason for this.
• Chickens do not eat the food they are supposed to eat and are not where they are supposed to live. This definitely affects the quality of the eggs.
• All the industrialized food in the world is not suitable for humans. Eggs are probably also on the list.
• In the process of breeding chickens to lay a lot of eggs, the material in the eggs also changes, so humans were not exposed to it (a similar process happened with wheat to prevent pests from eating it).
• I have not tested scientifically but I have seen that chickens live in harsh captivity conditions of dirt, diseases and serious injuries. The eggshell may not be sealed, and it absorbs toxic substances into it. In addition, the chickens receive large amounts of antibiotics on a regular basis to prevent morbidity.

Dairy products – yes, goat’s

Unlike plants, milk is intended for consumption, but not for human consumption. Acidifying the milk makes it much more suitable for humans. That is why it is better to consume only goat’s milk products and preferably acidulated, fermented or aged: yogurt, butter, cheeses and kefir.

Fermenting milk can make it more beneficial to humans in several ways:

• Improved digestion – Fermented milk contains beneficial bacteria called probiotics, which help break down lactose and ease digestion. This is especially important for people who are lactose intolerant, as they are unable to digest lactose themselves.
• Increased Nutrient Availability – Fermentation can increase the availability of certain nutrients in milk, such as vitamin B12 and folate. These nutrients are important for overall health and well-being.
• Lower lactose content – The fermentation process also reduces the lactose content of milk, making it more tolerable for people with lactose intolerance.
• Improving the taste and texture – Fermented dairy products, such as yogurt and kefir, often have a tangy, creamy taste and texture that many people enjoy.

All in all, fermenting milk can make it more nutritious, easier to digest and more enjoyable to consume.

It is best to avoid cow’s milk products altogether. It is important that the milk products come from natural pastures and not the kind of mixtures that the animals receive in cages.

Reasons to avoid cow’s milk products:

• Contains a large amount of beta casein A1 protein (humans ate beta casein A2 for most of the years of evolution).
• Beta-casomorphin-7 – BCM-7 is a peptide produced when A1 beta-casein is digested in the digestive system. BCM-7 has been shown to have opioid-like effects, which means it can bind to opioid receptors in the brain and nervous system. Some studies have suggested that BCM-7 may be associated with a variety of health problems, such as gastrointestinal discomfort, inflammation, neurological disorders, and heart disease. It is worth noting that BCM-7 is not present in A2 beta-casein, which is why some people may choose to consume A2 milk as an alternative to traditional cow’s milk that contains A1 and A2 beta-casein.
• Completely industrialized cow’s milk – all industrialized foods (soy, wheat, corn, oats, cow’s milk, eggs) are not good for us both in research and logically. This is on a probabilistic level.
• A cow receives food that is not suitable for her to produce a lot of milk and is also raised in abusive conditions.
• A study that compared the Maasai tribe that ate meat and cow’s milk with a corresponding tribe that was vegetarian.

Vegetables and leaves – better not

Most vegetables and leaves with toxins and anti-absorption minerals are harmful to us. Most vegetables are bitter or sour, so they signal to us and other animals not to eat them. If you insist on eating vegetables, then they should be well cooked. There is no reason to eat vegetables thinking that they are healthy for us, on the contrary. There is no such thing as healthy food, there is food that suits us. Vegetables and leaves were part of the human diet only during food shortages and not by free choice.

Vegetables that are best avoided: cucumber, potato, corn, tomatoes, eggplant, pepper, pumpkin and zucchini (it is better to steam them, article on vegetables and leaves ).

Reasons to avoid vegetables and leaves

• In ancient years, people hardly ate vegetables and leaves, except for medicinal purposes or when there was no choice.
• Vegetables are bitter or sour, which is a natural sign of toxicity.
• There are different types of toxins in plants: Nutrient Inhibitors, Lectins, Oxylates, Tannins, Protease Inhibitors, Phytic Acid, Cyanide, Hormone Disruptors
• ” Plants want to kill you “: Plants cannot run away like other animals, so they developed a mechanism to prevent them from being eaten mainly by producing toxins and this is a way of defending themselves. Both science shows this and logic.
• The defense mechanism of plants was not developed to prevent eating by humans but by small insects and other animals, therefore the effect of these toxins is often too slow to link that this food is not suitable for humans.
• Cooking and heating (a mechanism that plants did not encounter in evolution) destroys a large part of the toxins, but not all.
• All nutrients are found in meat, fish, milk and some fruits. This shows that these are the nutrients we are built on.
• The minerals and vitamins in plants are absorbed less well than meat and fish. For example, iron from a meat source (Heme Iron) is absorbed much better than iron from a plant source (Non Heme). Explanation about iron .
• Most plants will kill most animals.
• A small part of the plants is eaten by a small part of the animals. A koala must eat a eucalyptus leaf and neutralize its toxins. Any other diet will kill her, and the leaves of the tree she eats will poison the rest of the animals including us.
• Plants should be looked at more as medicine – in small doses and with great care and only in cases of illness.
• Plants have absorption inhibitors of important minerals. Cabbage for example disrupts the thyroid gland and its treatment with iodine.
• It makes sense that we don’t need leaves because they lack calories: spinach, kale, bok choy, lettuce and all the green leaves.

Seeds – no

Seeds are part of the food that is harmful to us, mainly because of the natural defense mechanisms of the seeds.

In order to eat them, they have to undergo soaking, acidification, sprouting and cooking to reduce the toxins (the lectins are part of plant toxins).

It is recommended to avoid flax, poppy, chia, sesame and tahini.

Rice – only for Asians

Rice is the kind of grain that you don’t miss, but it has known toxins that don’t break down just by heating. In addition, the Asians probably developed a digestive system that is more suitable for digesting rice after being exposed to it for thousands of years more than the white man. An example of genetic adaptation in some Asian populations due to specific food exposure is the increased prevalence of ALDH2*2, a variant of the aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) gene. This genetic trait is associated with a reduced ability to metabolize alcohol, leading to a condition known as alcohol reaction or “Asian wash.”

The variant is most commonly found in East Asian populations, including those of Chinese, Japanese, and Korean descent. The prevalence of this genetic trait may be related to historical consumption of rice-based alcohol, such as sake and soju, which have a relatively low alcohol content compared to other alcoholic beverages. The reduced ability to metabolize alcohol may provide a protective effect against excessive alcohol consumption and alcohol-related health problems in these populations.

Studies do show that Asians are more sensitive to milk because they have not been exposed to it like the white person. The prevalence of lactose intolerance varies between different populations and ethnic groups. In general, East Asian populations tend to have a higher incidence of lactose intolerance than populations of European descent. It is estimated that approximately 70%-100% of East Asians suffer from lactose intolerance, while the prevalence among people of European origin is lower, ranging between 5% and 20%.

The lectin found in rice is called “Oryza sativa agglutinin” or “rice agglutinin”. This protein can bind to specific sugar molecules and is involved in various biological functions within the plant and is designed to prevent pests from eating the rice seeds. Rice agglutinin is mainly found in the outer layers of rice grains, such as the bran. Just like gluten it probably harms humans.

In a completely free thought, because there were genetic changes in the white man and not in the Asians according to exposure to a certain food, the opposite also probably happened, that is, the Asians had genetic changes to support the digestion of rice. is a study that Asians had a genetic change in the digestion of seaweed. In addition, rice is not acidified and is known to contain a toxin called “agglutonin” when cross-referenced to the fact that rice makes me uncomfortable, it is highly probable that rice is not suitable for the white person or for a person whose ancestors were not exposed to rice.

Roots – no

All roots have toxins that need to be neutralized. Not good for everyone, but if so – then only after steaming or cooking: sweet potato, Jerusalem artichoke, artichoke.

In doubt: onion, garlic, shallot, leek, fennel, radish, radish, all mushrooms, yucca root. The logic is simple – roots in evolution added toxins that prevent pests from eating them. Heating and cooking probably lowers most of the toxins, but in people with damaged intestines, these toxins will do great damage in various body systems.

Salt – no

Completely avoid all types of salt as much as possible. Humans got along fine for millions of years without adding salt. (My Life Among The Indians, page 82, “I have never come across Indians who use any kind of salt, not even for drying meat”). According to the “Monkey Law” it is very likely that adding a new ingredient to the human menu harms health. Salt has been added to the menu in the past thousands of years and increasingly in recent years for all types of food. A study that shows how salt damages the digestive system and the good bacteria in the intestines.

Natural salt adds to the freshness of food and is probably harmful to us. Processed salt (probably the cheap salt you consume) is even more harmful to us. An interesting question is “Is our love of salt an acquired taste or is it “inherent in us”? From the research linked above it seems that the love of salty foods is acquired, therefore we have no real need to salt foods other than the desire to preserve the food. In most of the years of evolution we did not eat salt, therefore the logical conclusion is that we do not need salt and it does harm the millions of processes in the human body according to tool 7 in tools for freedom .

Nuts – no

You should minimize eating all types of nuts that do not have a shell or that have a little shell due to phytic acid. You should completely avoid peanuts and their nuts, which are legumes. It is better to soak nuts for a day in water with salt and dry them – this is how they used to eat them.

Legumes – no

It is better to reduce the consumption of chickpeas, beans, lentils, etc. or soak for 24 hours and cook for 3 hours. Studies show that not all people digest different types of food to the same extent. For example, Asians are more adapted to seaweed and rice than Europeans. It is possible that there are people from different parts of the world who know how to avoid the legume poisons after probably being exposed to them (I’m sure not among them).

Algae – no

The law of algae is the law of vegetables and leaves. If eaten, it is required to cook for several minutes in water.

It is recommended to check that you are not sensitive to algae, not all people have a sufficient amount of enzymes and intestinal bacteria that are suitable for breaking down algae in a good way.

Drugs and alcohol – no

The problem with drugs is that they play with our most important organ – the brain. That’s why I would recommend not messing around with any kind of drug. It’s pretty clear that drugs do long-term damage to our brains.

A small amount of alcohol is acceptable. It is not for nothing that drugs and alcohol are involved in most of the most violent and brutal crimes.

avoid at all costs

So what to avoid at all costs? All unleavened wheat products (bread, buckwheat, pasta, pastries), all oils, eggs, cow’s milk, processed salt, preservatives, corn, oats, sugar, beans, peanuts, potatoes, sugar substitutes, caffeine, antibiotics and stomach acid reducers. Also, completely avoid meat, bread and milk substitutes, they are completely processed and much less good for us than the original.

Only evolution with logic

All attempts to reach a suitable diet for humans failed because they tried to go through science or through emotion. Trying to understand “what is healthy? But the solution comes only through evolution, human history, the human ape and the exercise of logic, because we have no way of knowing exactly what they ate and in what quantities.

Arriving at a free diet, a diet suitable for humans is mainly through evolution and anthropology as well as with the help of self-experiments, reading studies, reading books , freedom to think and observing nature. Every animal (including humans) needs to eat what it ate in its past. We know today what the diet of the ancient man was also according to the remains found on the teeth of skeletons as well as from studying by observing the tribes that live today in different parts of the world. Imagine a person walking around outside, the most available food for him is – the animals. From the smallest animals like insects to the biggest like deer. In the rest of the foods, we compete with birds and various pests that ate them before us, such as the war over the fruits against the birds (indeed, most of the fruits are adapted to be eaten by birds), you don’t need wisdom to eat an apple, but you do need wisdom to hunt a squirrel or a deer. That is why we see the development of the human brain over time both in terms of adapting to a living environment that is getting harder and harder and also in terms of the need for cooperation in hunting.

We were separated, we invented agriculture and united

Humans left Africa in several waves. Starting about 100,000 years ago, humans scattered around the world, and in recent years have reunited with the help of flights and trade. The agricultural revolution happened 9,000 years ago, after we were separated. This necessarily means that there was individual adaptation to the environment and diet, because there was supposed to be a long separation between the different groups without much mixing, as well as the invention of agricultural methods and the breeding of animals and plants. That is why we see different skin tone, adaptation to different thin air and many other features that evolution had to adapt to different environmental and social conditions.

There are three types of foods:

• Good for everyone (the diet we left Africa with).
• Good for some people (a diet that some have adapted to over the years such as beans and South Americans).
• Not good for anyone (a diet that no one adapted to).

The best thing is to stick to what humans have been eating since ancient times, that is – the oldest food (good for everyone): fruits, fish, meat and honey and only then various grains (good for some people). Fat (non-animal) is not good for anyone.

Poisoning or just aging

When analyzing the data on the distribution of diseases in Western society, one cannot avoid seeing the symptoms of poisoning (which I believe was caused by the toxins in the plants): diabetes, arteriosclerosis, arthritis, obesity and a host of autoimmune diseases. These are diseases that did not exist in the hunter-gatherers (they may have died before the diseases appeared these, but even in hunters aged 30-40, the signs of these diseases should have been seen, but they are not, not even in the preserved tribes). Today we live to old ages, so we probably see the effect of the toxins from the food. Here you will read an article where it is clear that the writer is guessing what to eat. There is no free thought here. Veganism is the opposite of a free diet (in my opinion), because even though it has logic, compassion for animals and preservation of the environment so to speak, it is not suitable for humans because it contains plant toxins. Veganism, like other types of nutrition, is very valuable when it does not include processed food and sugar. According to all the information that I have seen and analyzed, man is built to eat mainly from animals, it is also seen that meat and fat do not increase our sugar, when in fact high sugar in humans is destructive to all body systems. The important question is how many years we have been exposed to this food. Meat entered our diet a few million years ago, bread from 7,000 years ago and canola oil from only 40 years ago, so it is quite clear what the chances of adaptation are for each of these foods. In addition, humans migrated and dispersed throughout the world, and thus their diet was adapted to where they were, and not necessarily to what they were supposed to eat, for example in South America the diet was mainly corn and potatoes, compared to Japan, where the diet was fish and rice. Indeed, we see great differences in the life expectancy of the Japanese compared to the South Americans, in ancient times and even today. Rice is a prime example of a specific food that only Asians were exposed to. A study that shows that there is a difference in the digestive system between humans and a study that shows the ability of Asians to digest seaweed. Today we know that corn and potatoes have a lot of toxins, which makes sense because they have developed defense mechanisms against pests. A potato does not have a period when it “wants” pests to eat it (unlike fruits). Science shows that cooking does not remove all the toxins from the potato, although of course the “trick” of heating was not taken into account in the evolution of the potato. When humans began to use fire to cook and roast food, their menu expanded to include roots, vegetables, legumes, and the like – food they could not eat without the use of fire. Of course, the heating did not remove all the toxins from the plants, therefore additional methods such as soaking, sprouting and fermentation were developed in order to be able to consume these foods.

Poisoning can do basically anything and give its signals at any time. In my opinion “the whole of humanity” is poisoned by plant toxins. There is no way that humans can eat so many types of plants when each plant has hundreds or dozens of different toxins.

It’s not a coincidence that children don’t like vegetables and leaves and often show a natural aversion to bitter, spicy and sour tastes, which probably indicate toxicity, and in fact, natural selection developed an aversion to these tastes. Our natural instinct is not to like spicy, bitter and sour because it symbolizes toxicity. Sweet and fatty means ready to eat and this is critical for free thinking about nutrition. An instinctive preference for sweet and fatty tastes may reflect a willingness to consume safe and easily digestible foods.

Hunter-gatherers, who lived before the advent of agriculture, seem to have fewer of the chronic diseases that plague modern societies. Many researchers believe that their health deteriorated once they adopted farming methods, suggesting that the change to the agricultural lifestyle may have had unwanted consequences on human health, similar to slow poisoning, rather than just the effects of aging.

It is also seen that populations that transition from a life in nature to a modern life are the most vulnerable to modern food because they were not exposed to it like we are for several thousand years and did not undergo appropriate genetic adaptation. For example, Aboriginal people are many times more vulnerable to diabetes, high blood pressure, heart problems and more. This shows that the modern diet is basically not good for anyone, but for those who have not been exposed for thousands of years, it is even more harmful. Native Americans for example are more sensitive to alcohol because they had no choice or evolutionary introduction to it, but the white man also suffered from such an addiction that impaired his ability to have children.

Before the Agricultural Revolution, humans relied on a diet of fruits and animal protein that provided a balanced variety of nutrients. Some evidence suggests that they had stronger bones, healthier teeth and a lower incidence of chronic conditions such as obesity, diabetes and heart disease than modern humans.

However, with the transition to agriculture, the human diet focused more on grains, fruits and plants which led to an increase in carbohydrate consumption. This change in dietary habits contributed to a decline in overall health, as people became more susceptible to nutritional deficiencies, dental problems, and chronic diseases.

While the Agricultural Revolution enabled the development of complex human societies and the growth of civilization, it also had a significant impact on human health. It seems that the transition from a hunter-gatherer lifestyle to an agricultural one led to an increase in chronic diseases and health problems reminiscent of slow poisoning and not just the effects of aging.

Excellent article about cyanide in plants.

don’t stretch the “no” muscle

We are not built to resist temptation all the time. That’s why it’s recommended to simply not put food that you don’t want to eat within reach. It is also better not to see cigarettes, if you want to stop.

Regarding the question of whether to expose children to unhealthy food at home – unequivocally no. Now keep reading.

For children, resisting temptation is usually more challenging than for adults, making it especially helpful to minimize exposure to unhealthy options at home. There are several reasons why it will be harder for children to say no to temptations:

• Underdeveloped Impulse Control – Children’s brains, especially the prefrontal cortex responsible for decision making and impulse control, are not fully developed. As a result, they often struggle with self-regulation and are more likely to give in to immediate desires instead of considering long-term consequences.
• Limited understanding of consequences – Young children may not understand the potential negative outcomes of unhealthy choices, such as the impact on their long-term health or the risk of developing chronic diseases. This lack of understanding makes it difficult for them to resist temptations.
• Strong influence of external stimuli – children are very sensitive to stimuli in their environment, including visual cues, smells and tastes. When faced with tempting, unhealthy options, they may have difficulty resisting due to their heightened responsiveness to these stimuli.
• Peer pressure – Children can be heavily influenced by their peers and may feel pressured to indulge in unhealthy choices if their friends do. This social influence can make it more challenging for them to say no to temptations.
• Emotional connection to food – Children may associate certain foods with comfort, love or reward, making it difficult for them to refuse these items when they are available at home.

By reducing the presence of unhealthy foods in the home, parents can help their children avoid these temptations and make healthier choices more accessible. This approach not only supports children in developing better eating habits, but also sets them up for long-term success in maintaining a balanced and nutritious diet.

Humans are naturally vulnerable to temptation, and resisting it all the time can be challenging. Research and examples from everyday life indicate that one effective strategy for avoiding unhealthy habits or addictive behaviors is to eliminate or minimize exposure to the source of temptation.

For example when it comes to food, studies have shown that people are more likely to consume unhealthy snacks when they are easily accessible (Wansink, Painter, & Lee, 2006). By keeping such items out of sight or not purchasing them at all, people can reduce the likelihood of becoming addicted to them. Instead, placing healthier food options like fruits and vegetables within easy reach can encourage better eating habits.

Similarly, for those trying to quit smoking, research suggests that avoiding visual cues or reminders can be helpful. A study by Tiffany and Drobs (1991) found that people exposed to smoking-related cues experienced stronger cravings for cigarettes. Thus, keeping cigarettes out of sight and avoiding environments where smoking is common can support people in their effort to quit.

Understanding our innate susceptibility to temptation can help us devise strategies to resist it more effectively. By reducing exposure to unhealthy or addictive stimuli, we can make it easier for ourselves to maintain healthier habits and behaviors.

Substitute substitutes

In a non-scientific way, although it doesn’t suit me that much, nature doesn’t like being outsmarted and there are mechanisms against it, for example global warming, when the natural environment on Earth is destroyed or the fact that we are not supposed to consume unfermented gluten products, clean sugar, caffeine and processed meat or meat which is grown in unnatural conditions, and the substitutes are often much more toxic to us than the original.

In scientific terms, substitutes for common foods such as milk, sugar, gluten and meat are not recommended because they are often concentrates, and they are not as healthy as they are marketed. They often have negative effects on our health. Most of the concentrates known today are not good for us because in the years of our evolution we were not exposed to them. If we take tahini as an example, a 100 gram portion of tahini contains about a kilogram of sesame, it is quite clear that eating a kilo of sesame makes no sense, and the problem is that sesame contains natural toxins that are supposed to prevent pests from eating it, sesame concentrate contains a concentration of toxins. Worst of all is oat-based milk replacer, especially toxic oats.

Milk alternatives such as almond, soy or rice milk are actually a concentration of these products, which have natural toxins and in their concentration we are actually consuming a concentration of these toxins. Also, the substitutes lack essential nutrients found in cow’s or goat’s milk, such as calcium, vitamin D and protein. Studies show that plant milk may not provide the same health benefits as cow’s milk and that there are toxic substitutes found in soy and almonds.

Sugar substitutes, such as artificial sweeteners can help reduce calories, but some studies have found they can lead to weight gain, diabetes and other health problems. Natural sugar alternatives such as honey or agave syrup still contain calories and can contribute to weight gain if consumed in excess.

The right way is simply not to consume products that have added sugar, you get used to it quickly. Sugar substitutes only work on you, most likely they are not really better than sugar. The only substitute for clean sugar is zero clean sugar.

Gluten-free products are important for people with celiac disease. For people with gluten sensitivity, which is basically everyone, it is best to stay away from industrial gluten substitutes. Gluten is present in types of wheat, and the right way is to avoid wheat altogether and not try to be clever with substitutes. Gluten replacement foods can be high in calories, sugar and unhealthy fats.

Meat substitutes, such as soy-based products, seitan or plant-based hamburgers, are basically a concentrate of soy, pea or other plant, and usually contain a concentration of the natural toxins in soy, pea or other plants. Humans are not adapted to eat from the plant, unless it is a ripe fruit or has undergone a process to remove the toxins, such as acidification or prolonged heating.

Why “fat”? say “not skinny”

We are born with the ability to be good in almost every field, this also includes the field of mathematics. To excel in math you simply have to spend hours practicing, while to be at a healthy weight, it’s simple to eat what suits us as humans regardless of the quantities. There are individuals with genetic problems that cause an inability to learn math or with chronic metabolic diseases that cause them to be at an abnormal weight. Being at a normal weight basically means not suffering from a metabolic disease. The body has a complex mechanism that knows how to bring us to an appropriate weight. Just like the hundreds of mechanisms that support sugar, vitamin C and sodium levels, this is called homeostasis. The body wants to be balanced and this is also true for weight!

One of the signs of a metabolic disease is hunger shortly after meals and a weight that is very different from the weight we were at the age of 18.

What exactly does genetics help?

Genetics does help us eat things that are not suitable for us and not get fat from it, but anyone who eats food suitable for humans will be at a normal weight. Genetics actually helps us not to get a metabolic disease (the weight stabilization mechanism no longer works well) despite “poisoning” the body with food that is not suitable for us. But genetics also work up to a certain age. You see it when at a certain age people are no longer at the weight they were before. From science and logic it seems that what is important is – what we eat so as not to spoil our weight stabilization mechanism and not the amounts. After all, let’s say a bird that encounters 100 tons of cherries, won’t swell up and won’t be able to fly – the genes of these birds protect it, a bird without this defense mechanism is no longer in the wild, but if we give it a substance that “confuses” its weight stabilization system (like transgenic corn) You may reach a weight where you can’t fly and run away from madmen.

There’s nothing like an experiment to prove

Do an experiment on your dog – give him as much raw or cooked meat as he can eat. See if he gets fat. Give him some dog food he can eat and see what makes him fat.

Basic signaling

A signal of thirst and hunger

Just like you trust your body to signal when you are cold or hot and you don’t check exactly what the temperature is, this is exactly how the body knows to signal if it is hungry or thirsty and you should listen to it. Sometimes in illness the body signals a reluctance to eat and this makes perfect sense, during illness the body prefers to direct its energy to fighting and not to digestion. One of the problems is a metabolic disease where the body actually loses the ability to signal to us that we are full, the only way to be cured of this disease is by eating food that is adapted for humans. Years of eating not adapted to humans causes metabolic disease, everyone gets it at a different age. The same principle applies to drinking – as long as you don’t confuse your body with caffeine, alcohol or other diuretics.

The bottom line that comes from logic and science is: drink water when you’re thirsty and eat when you’re hungry. In a free diet, you eat less carbohydrates and more meat and fish. Therefore it is important not to be afraid to eat much more meat and fish than you were used to, eat until you are full. Wait for the signal that you are not hungry anymore.

Why doesn’t the body signal us that we are poisoned?

The body signals to us that we are poisoned through the ability to differentiate between bitter, sweet, spicy, sour, as well as using the sense of smell – smelly food is most likely spoiled and we will not eat it. It’s a primal instinct developed over millions of years of evolution.

You must be asking yourself, “So how does spicy taste to me?” or “How does bitter wasabi taste to me?” Then bring more.’

The body’s systems know how to direct the missing substances in the body to where they are needed more in the near term (usually brain and energy) and only then in the long term (bone strength and more – you see this in osteoporosis). In this article Professor Bruce Ames explains the theory of mineral and vitamin routing.

Another mechanism of bias from a chemical substance works with a cigarette. Nicotine gives the brain a good signal, and we associate it with a cigarette and get a good feeling, even though the cigarette wants to kill us, the brain associates it with something good because of the nicotine – the body thinks short term.

The body has a natural mechanism that makes us want to keep eating food that we ate and didn’t kill us. Give the child spicy enough times, and he will start to like spicy. The test is in the initial taste and you see this in children: they want fat and sweet.

Poisoning from plant toxins can manifest itself in different ways and at any time, which makes it a common and worrisome issue. Humans are exposed to a wide variety of toxins from plants, since each plant can contain hundreds or even thousands of different toxins.

Research has shown that repeated exposure to certain flavors can change a person’s taste preferences over time. A study published in the journal Appetite found that children who were repeatedly exposed to vegetables they initially disliked were more likely to develop a preference for those vegetables over time.

In conclusion, plant toxins may pose a significant health risk, and children may exhibit a natural preference for sweet and fatty foods. However, repeated exposure to certain flavors can change taste preferences, and it is important to be aware of the potential long-term health consequences of prolonged exposure to certain substances.

A sign of beauty

We know from a young age to notice that straightness looks good and straightness is sick.

No one explained it to us, but we immediately recognize that shapely is beautiful and fat is not beautiful. White teeth are beautiful and yellow and brown teeth are not beautiful, why were we born with such abilities?

We receive a signal about beauty from the brain because such beauty shows fertility, which gave us an option to pass on our genes.

Does the body know how to signal a lack of minerals and the like?

When animals sense a lack of minerals, they lick mineral feeders. Is our desire for salt a similar signal of the body? Do we have a thirst for minerals like the feeling of thirst for water? Desire to meat?

There is a signal from the body about fresh and warm food that tastes best to us, and for good reasons, it is easier to digest, more nutritious and with less bad bacteria. In my opinion, and this is a bit of a gamble, the body knows how to signal a lack of minerals by wanting to eat meat mainly. I personally sometimes feel it. I don’t eat many types of food at the same time, for example pickled teff bread with fish, beef with bone marrow or goat yogurt with roasted plantains. I believe that flooding the world with many types of food blurs the signal to eat a certain type of food that contains minerals that we lack, but as mentioned this is a bet I make from observing animals that lick mineral stores, from our love for salt, and it also makes sense from an evolutionary point of view that animals would feel a lack and want to eat food that has it the ingredient they lack.

How is sourdough bread and sour goat yogurt still suitable for humans?

Good question! Bread or any other grain that has been leavened is suitable for us even though it is sour and the logical explanation is that it is new in our evolution, it is probably one of the exceptions, and indeed in sourdough there are many lactobacillus bacteria that we recognize as expected as sour. The same is true of sour yogurt for us, but it is much more suitable for us than milk, because of the lactobacillus bacteria. The leavened bread will only be good for us after baking, while the yogurt does not require heating. While both sourdough and yogurt involve lactic acid bacteria in their fermentation processes, the specific bacteria involved are usually different.

Yogurt is mainly produced by fermenting milk through the action of lactic acid bacteria, especially Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus bulgaricus. These two types of bacteria work together to convert the lactose, the sugar in milk, into lactic acid, which thickens the milk and gives yogurt the characteristic sour taste of yogurt and a product with bacteria, but this time they are good for us.

In contrast, sourdough relies on a mixture of wild yeast and lactic acid bacteria, such as those from the genera Lactobacillus and Leuconostoc, to ferment the dough.

Although there may be some overlap in the types of lactic acid bacteria present in sourdough and yogurt, the specific bacterial species and the fermentation processes involved are usually different, resulting in different flavors and textures.

Be on the right side of the bet

It is important for me to present one important principle according to which I act: “Eat what our distant ancestors ate”, and logic does not show that they were wrong. It’s actually being on the right side of the bet because we don’t know exactly what is suitable for us to eat, but when you bring a new food that contains a new substance and ask “does it heal or poison us?” there is a 9,999 to 10,000 chance that it poisons and a 1 to 10,000 chance that it heals , because millions of chemical processes take place in the body, and the chance that you have found a new substance is a slim chance.

Which side of the bet do you choose? Give the human body some credit for knowing how to do without spinach or kale or superfoods. That’s exactly how evolution and natural selection work – by finding the right way out of thousands of other ways, but it’s unlikely that this or that super food improves the millions of processes in the body, and there’s no way you’re the one who just found that way.

The recommended daily amount of minerals and vitamins RDA is completely wrong because it is based on people eating plants that have toxins that inhibit absorption of iron and many other important minerals.

The big “secret” in nutrition is that in the end we enjoy most types of food equally, it only takes a few days to get used to the new diet. There isn’t a person who hasn’t changed their mind at least once in their life about a certain food, so you can probably understand what I mean. Humans are adaptive, that is, we get used to what we do on a daily basis and usually end up liking it. That’s why the thought of “I can’t change what I eat now” is incorrect. Humans are not adapted to eat most types of food, even if the food is natural and tasty. A diet that is good for some people affects everyone differently because of a person’s genes and environment, just like character traits are affected by the environment and genes.

In nature, humans hardly mixed carbohydrates with protein and fats, this is what causes the metabolism problem in modern society. The humans who lived in the wild, hunted an elephant, ate it and after a few hours when they were hungry they ate fruit. The mixing of carbohydrates with protein and fat causes the problem of sugar and obesity (meat takes a long time to digest, and during this time the sugar is high because of the carbohydrate).

Most forms of nutrition, such as ketogenic, paleo, vegan, vegetarian, carnivore, show an improvement in health because they reduce the consumption of processed food, but they have problematic ingredients – such as plant toxins, especially in whole grains, cow’s milk, and more.

Ignore the numbers – 24 grams of protein

You’ve probably read that we need 200 grams of protein, 59 grams of carbs, 25 grams of fat a day (or whatever weird thing like that) to maintain our health. But the human body is much more complex than that. He knows how to store minerals and vitamins and give us a feeling when something is missing. When you hear dieticians or doctors talking as if the human body is a recipe for cake, just ignore it.

In the millions of years of evolution man survived without counting how much meat, fruit or bread he ate. Usually the advice of these people is the opposite of what you should really eat. They will often say “need a carb” at every meal! Of course the opposite is true because the body will break down fat and protein much better when there is no carbohydrate in the area. This is due to the acidity needed for the enzymes to work optimally in the stomach, for carbohydrates a relatively low acidity is needed, and for breaking down fats and proteins relatively high.

The financial price of eating freely

A free diet is not more expensive than a normal diet, on the contrary, it can be cheaper.

A kg of teff costs about NIS 20. When you make the bread yourself, it costs the same as supermarket bread.

There are savings on all sugary drinks of all kinds because you only drink water.

Fruits and goat yogurt cost the same in a normal diet and a free diet, it is unnecessary to buy organic.

In a free diet you have to eat much more meat and fish than usual and here there is a cost but not significant and it is offset by the other things that are removed from the toxic diet.

Bottom line: a free diet may cost a little more in the short term, but it will save you a lot of money on health expenses and care for your body, mind and teeth. Being sick costs a lot of money and is also unpleasant.

The food test

Can we eat food without cooking, heating or using chemicals?

If we have tasted, and the food is not bitter, spicy or sour then it is good for us. It’s better to cook food before eating it, but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t eat other foods, it’s just a way to know what’s good for us. For example: wheat cannot be eaten without heating and grinding, so it is less suitable. Fish and meat can be eaten as is and therefore adapted for humans.

The logic behind the test stems from the fact that humans have used fire and heating food widely for only a few hundred thousand years compared to a few million years of evolution in the apes, therefore we are quite adapted to eat raw food (that is not heated or cooked) – food that is heated or cooked needs to check.

Do not eat poisons instead of the legend of “detoxification”

Our body is equipped with natural detoxification mechanisms that work effectively without the need for special workshops. In fact, the body eliminates toxins continuously, not only during specific events or special places, such as weekends in Mitzpe Ramon. It is important to understand that we are meant to consume solid food that requires chewing. The main idea is not to poison our body from the beginning, and we achieve this by following a free diet.

Chewing activates the release of various enzymes in our digestive system, promoting efficient digestion and absorption of nutrients. On the other hand, consuming mixed or ground food may lead to rapid absorption and cause an increase in blood sugar levels, which is not ideal for our body. As a result, many nutritional shakes may not be necessary or beneficial for us.

Furthermore, our bodies are not naturally adapted to processing a mixture of fruits, nuts and vegetables at once. This dietary pattern was not common in human history, but only developed in recent years. As a result, it is essential to approach our diet with the perspective of evolution, science, logic and in short free thought.

There is food that is suitable for humans and food that is not, the definition “healthy food” or “super food” are not logical definitions.

The way humans eat when there is only grass around

That’s the magic about goats and sheep, they eat grass, and then we can eat their milk products or them. That is why humans were always close to goats and sheep in ancient times, because really finding grass is much more difficult than finding fruit, and vegetables were hardly eaten. Yes, everyone is wrong about cow’s milk. Eating fermented goat’s milk dates back thousands of years. There are archaeological sites that show cheese production as early as 9,000 years ago. The difference between cow’s milk and goat’s milk in terms of our ability to digest them is in a protein called casein.

Somewhere in history a mutation was created in only European cows that caused them to give more beta casein type A2 protein in milk. In my opinion, this mutation also affects the health of the beef. Beta-casein A1 and beta-casein A2 proteins are subtypes of casein found in the milk of various mammals, including goats, sheep and cows. The composition and ratio of these casein subtypes can vary between species, breeds and even individual animals. Beta-casein A1 is present in milk from certain breeds of cows, such as Holstein cows and in sheep’s milk but less than cow’s milk. When digested, beta-casein A1 may release a bioactive peptide called beta-casomorphin-7 (BCM-7), which has been linked to gastrointestinal discomfort, inflammation and slowed gastric emptying. And the interesting point: beta-casein A1 and A2 are two versions of beta-casein milk protein. The genetic mutation that resulted in the A1 variant occurred approximately 5,000 to 10,000 years ago, the genetic mutation that resulted in the A1 beta-casein variant involved a single amino acid substitution in the protein chain. This seemingly small change changed the way the protein breaks down during digestion. In my opinion, this mutation also affects beef. And it has occurred in European cattle breeds, especially Bos Shur.

The original beta-casein protein in beef was of the A2 type, which can still be found in some traditional cattle breeds, such as the African and Asian Bos indicus cattle, as well as some Bos taurus breeds such as Guernsey and Jersey cows.

goats

Goat’s milk generally contains a lower proportion of beta-casein A1 compared to cow’s milk and sheep’s milk. Some goat breeds even produce milk with little or no A1 beta-casein. The content of beta-casein A2 in goat milk is usually higher than beta-casein A1, which gives goat milk its characteristic properties and for some people makes it easier to digest.

sheep

The beta-casein A1 content in sheep’s milk is generally higher than in goat’s milk, but it varies between breeds. The beta-casein A2 content is also present, but the exact ratio between beta-casein A1 and beta-casein A2 can vary depending on the breed and type of sheep.

fruit

Cow’s milk generally contains a higher proportion of beta-casein A1 compared to goat’s milk, with the content of beta-casein A1 varying between breeds. Holstein cows, for example, generally have a higher A1 beta-casein content than Jersey cows. The beta-casein A2 content is also present in cow’s milk, but the ratio between the different types depends on the breed and genetics of the cow.

Logic shows that goats are preferred because it is easier to raise goats in mountainous areas and also the history of man was accompanied by goats. Proverbs 27: “Vedi כל֬ב עַיִחים לֽלאחמך לֽל֣חם בֵּיִת֑ך וְדִי ׀ חל֬ב אַיִ֗ים לֽלאחמקֽך׃” And when science and logic agree, then the chances of the truth of things are high.

Experience is worth a thousand studies

Try everything written here on yourself. For example, drink two glasses of cow’s milk compared to two glasses of goat’s milk. If you have a particular sensitivity to one of them, you will feel it immediately.

Try to eat freely and see if it makes a difference for the better, you won’t lose anything from this experience. In the long run this is insane profit, exactly what free thought is looking for – minimal energy investment and huge profit.

Experiments that do not do much harm are excellent because they are both reliable and an experience that is usually remembered.

There’s nothing like an experiment – I bought normal milk and milk that is type A2 in the US. My daughter and I both drank a glass of milk at different times, my wife was angry with me for doing experiments on our daughter, but I calmed her down and said it was for the good of humanity. After we drank the normal milk, me and my daughter Mine had a stomachache and she also had a headache. After we drank the A2 milk, she obviously didn’t know what kind of milk she was drinking. In Israel, you can’t buy type A2 milk.

Another experiment you should do – eat a kilo of beef and then a day later eat a kilo of fish or a kilo of lamb and see the difference in feeling.

A chef restaurant is the method of preparation

In nutrition what is important is the ingredients. Although the method of preparation is not always significant, certain processes, such as acidification and fermentation in grains, are essential for eliminating toxins. It is important to observe food combinations from the same family, as digestion can change based on the presence of carbohydrates, proteins and fats. For example, types of meat together or fish makes sense. Gourmet restaurants often give priority to taste without considering the nutritional consequences of their dishes, using different ingredients and preparation techniques that may not be optimal for our health. Therefore, it is recommended to exercise caution when eating at such restaurants, where the taste may outweigh the nutritional value. For example, when it comes to meat, the quality and origin of the meat (such as grass-fed lamb) are more important than the way the raw material is prepared by the chef.

I personally really don’t like small, unidentifiable dishes, on the contrary, I like large dishes that I know for sure what’s in them. There is a kind of general order to it.

You are poisoning your dog

Pets were never exposed to corn, soy, wheat, oats until the food companies put these products into their dry food.

Consumption of grains containing toxins leads to negative health effects in dogs and cats for the following reasons:

• Reduced absorption of nutrients – Antinutrients like phytates can bind to minerals like calcium, iron and zinc, reducing their bioavailability and making it difficult for pets to absorb these essential nutrients. Over time, this can lead to nutrient deficiencies.
• Gastrointestinal disorder – Certain anti-nutritional substances, such as lectins, can irritate the lining of the digestive tract and cause symptoms such as vomiting, diarrhea or abdominal pain. This is especially true if the grains are consumed raw or improperly cooked.
• Allergies and sensitivities: Some pets may suffer from allergies or sensitivities to specific grains, which can cause inflammation and digestive distress. Grains such as wheat and corn are common allergens for dogs and cats.
• Inflammatory response: Certain anti-nutrients can contribute to inflammation in the body that can worsen existing health problems or lead to the development of new ones.

Pet food manufacturers are aware of the potential risks associated with toxins (anti-nutrients), but they are much cheaper than salmon or chicken.

And yes, the vets are wrong.

cereals

The following grains are fit to eat only after soaking for 48 hours, fermenting for 48 hours and then cooking:

• Millet (MILLET);
• sorghum ;
• AMARANTH;
• FONIO;
• Wild rice and some white rice – mainly for Asians. Can’t believe we’ve evolved far enough to be used to eating them.

All other grains should be avoided completely!

As the ancients sang and missed – you need to remove their problematic toxins from the grains. Grains are like seeds and they “don’t want” to be eaten, so you have to perform an action that they weren’t “ready for” in nature. Animals do not know how to soak, marinate and heat. By soaking the seeds, the seeds think they will germinate and therefore a detoxification mechanism is activated. In acidification – bacteria such as lactobacilli break down the toxins, and cooking destroys some of the toxins.

Free thought helps us to understand that our ancestors did not miss bread because of the taste, but with the aim of avoiding health problems and so that the bread would be preserved longer. Today, in most places where there is wheat, it is genetically different and is not leavened, hence the problems!

Animal fat – yes

X beef butter – possibly problematic because of neu5gc .

Goat butter VX – possibly problematic because of neu5gc and also because it is actually a concentrate from the milk.

VVV fish oil – helps sun exposure because of omega 3.

Goose and duck oil V – they have almost no neu5gc and are therefore safe.

VX cow fat – may be problematic because of neu5gc.

It’s not just that humans like the taste of fat. It does not raise blood sugar and is the most energetically efficient. Tribes in the Pole living on a diet of fish and animals alone do not suffer from high blood pressure or any heart problems – this is conclusive proof that animal fat is not the problem in Western society. It may be problematic in some animals.

Oil and vegetable fat – no

Oil from some plant XXX

X olive oil

Canola oil and other vegetable fats are basically concentrated forms of toxins found in plants. These oils were introduced to our diet only in the last decades, historically humans did not consume these substances in large quantities. Studies show that these toxins can harm human health. Furthermore, heating vegetable oil can further increase its toxicity.

It is therefore surprising that many people consider olive oil a healthy food. In reality, there is no such thing as a healthy food or a “superfood”. Rather, certain foods may be better suited to certain people or circumstances than others. As far as olive oil is concerned, it is important to note that it is made from unripe and bitter olives that may contain a significant amount of toxins. As such, it is advisable to use olive oil as much as possible and in any case it is better to choose animal oils, which are suitable for humans. Vascular diseases, including heart diseases, are accelerated by sugar and vegetable oils and not by animal fats and oils. One of their causes are lectins, which are proteins found mainly in plants and grains that are supposed to prevent animals from eating them. An article on lectins and the damage to blood vessels.

Wesson, Paul. “Olive oil: history, production and characteristics of the classic oils in the world. ” Research on the use of oils .

Throughout history olive oil has had many documented uses. All cultures used olive oil mainly as lamp fuel, which was its greatest value. Many ceremonies included the use of olive oil, including the anointing of royalty, warriors and the general public to the religious. The term Messiah means “the anointed one”. Fragrant olive oils were used to make offerings to the gods, as salves to cure diseases and to make the skin and hair look healthier. The Greeks ritually poured olive oil on the athlete’s skin and then scraped it off with the sweat and dust after the competition. It was also used to make soap and sanctify the dead. Very little documentation exists of the use of olive oil for human consumption.

Fish – yes or no?

Sea fish V

Sardines in water without preservatives V

Tuna in water without preservatives V

Seafood V

X pond fish

The fish that exist today are closer to the types of fish that were eaten in the past, more than the types of meat that exist today at our disposal, therefore sea fish or fish caught in the wild and not in ponds, are the most recommended.

It is recommended to consume sea fish, preferably those with high fat percentages, and avoid pond fish. Pond fish are usually fed grains, soy and other substances that are not natural to fish, making them less nutritious. Studies have shown that wild-caught fish is the best choice, as it contains many beneficial substances, including high levels of omega-3 fatty acids and iodine.

Humans are well adapted to eating fish, and can even be consumed raw without side effects, indicating that they are suitable for human consumption. In addition, allergies to fish are relatively rare, and an allergy to a certain food often indicates its toxicity.

Also, it is recommended to eat grains and fish separately and not to combine them in the same meal. This is because they have different digestive requirements and may not be optimally absorbed when eaten together.

In conclusion:

Sea fish consumption is recommended due to their high nutritional content, and fish caught in the wild are better than fish raised in a pond. Allergies to fish are rare, and fish can be consumed raw or cooked. Eating grains and fish separately is also recommended for optimal digestion and absorption of nutrients.

Meat – yes

It is good for us to eat herbivores and not mixed eaters that grew up in the pasture: chicken, duck, goose, goat, buffalo, deer and elk.

The human body is built for a meat-based diet to break down fat, you can see it in the five different organs that have to work simultaneously to break down fat. Even cows that eat grass, the end product absorbed into the blood is fatty acids formed from fiber by bacteria in their intestines. They chew the grass and add saliva to get a new surface for their gut bacteria and break down the fiber into fatty acids. So it’s no surprise that eating fat makes digestion easier.

You should minimize eating poultry or animals that eat grains, such as soy, barley and corn. The basic rule is that if it is not written on the package that they ate only grass, then the cow or chicken received food that is not suitable for them. In Israel the information is not published, but in the US it is very common to state this. The internal organs and fat of the animals are the most nutritious parts.

It is important not to mix grains and carbohydrates with meat, and you should eat them separately from each other, several hours apart from each other.

A description of human societies that ate mostly meat.

Unlike sea fish, there is a difference between the meat they once ate and the meat of domesticated domestic animals, but despite the differences it is still close enough to suit us.

Paleolithic populations consumed mainly animal protein – game meat, usually from vegetarian animals such as cattle that lived in herds, including deer, bison, horses and mammoths. The nutritional profile of this meat is significantly different from the meat available in modern supermarkets. Contemporary meat contains much more fat in the form of subcutaneous adipose tissue, connective tissue surfaces and fibers within the muscle itself.

Domesticated animals have always been fatter than their wild counterparts due to a consistent food supply and reduced exercise. Recent feeding methods and forms of rearing have further increased the fat content to meet consumer preferences – soft and juicy. As a result, the percentage of fat in today’s slaughtered animals can reach about 25% or more. In contrast, a study of 15 vegetarian African animal species found their average fat percentage to be 4%.

Not only is there more fat in domesticated animals, but also its composition is quite distinct. The main reason for the difference is the mixture of food given to domesticated animals, but in the US and other developed countries it is possible to obtain meat from animals that ate only grass and not a mixture. Fat from wild animals contains five times more polyunsaturated fatty acids than fat from domesticated animals. Furthermore, animal fat includes a significant amount (about 4%) of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), a long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid known for its protective effects against atherosclerosis and malignant diseases. Domesticated beef contains only trace amounts of EPA.

Wild animal meat has fewer calories and more protein per unit weight than domesticated animal meat, although the amino acid composition of their muscle tissue is similar. Since the cholesterol content of fat is similar to that of muscle tissue, the cholesterol content of wild animal meat is not expected to be significantly different from supermarket meat.

Slaughter a sacred cow?

Beef is problematic because neugc5 is found most abundantly in beef, so it is not suitable for humans. Man was exposed to today’s industrial cow meat relatively recently, compared to goats that were domesticated ten thousand years ago. Cows have been improved and are a whole industry compared to the goat industry. Therefore it seems that it is better to bet on goats and not on cows. All the food of the big industries, chicken, eggs, soy, wheat, rice and milk are not good for us, so probably beef too. The Indians are right that they treat cows as sacred. Neu5Gc N-glycolylneuraminic acid – is a type of sialic acid, a sugar molecule found on the surface of cells in many mammals, including cows, sheep and goats. However, humans do not naturally synthesize Neu5Gc due to a genetic mutation in the CMAH gene that occurred during evolution. Instead, humans produce a similar sialic acid called Neu5Ac N-acetylneuraminic acid.

Neu5GC – is present in most types of meat, especially in fat and internal organs in beef. It is a problematic substance when our intestines are injured (in a large part of the population) and possibly even when they are not injured. In beef it is present in high concentration, in sheep and goats it is also present, although in smaller quantities. Although the science is inconclusive about it, I am of the opinion that it is better to avoid red meat (beef) if possible.

A study that tested the effect of Neu5GC in animals. Humans have been exposed to Neu5gc for hundreds of thousands of years. A study on the Masai tribe , for example, lives on the meat, milk and blood of cattle and goats, and no cancers were found in it. Between the two Maasai tribes it was found that there were more problems of cartilage erosion than the corresponding tribe that did not eat meat. This could be a hint that red meat can cause joint problems.

In mammals that produce Neu5Gc, it plays a role in various cellular processes, including signaling, adhesion, and cell recognition. Sialic acids, such as Neu5Gc, are often involved in interactions between cells and their environment and contribute to essential biological functions.

In humans, Neu5Gc is consumed through eating red meat and cow’s milk products mainly. After ingestion, Neu5Gc is absorbed into tissues, despite the body’s inability to synthesize it. The immune system recognizes Neu5Gc as a foreign substance and may trigger an immune response and produce antibodies against Neu5Gc. This immune response can lead to inflammation, which is hypothesized to play a role in various health problems, such as cancer, heart disease, and other chronic conditions.

There is evidence to suggest that Neu5Gc may have an effect on the joints, potentially contributing to inflammation and joint-related conditions. My bet is that it is a somewhat problematic substance for humans (it leads to toxins in humans), when our intestines are injured, there is a lot of it entering the bloodstream, and in people who are less able to deal with it – Asians, for example, who were not exposed to cows like a white person was not exposed to rice. Therefore, I would recommend reducing everything related to products that come from a cow.

Who needs minerals and vitamins when there are nutritional supplements?

It is important to understand that a lack of minerals and vitamins is a symptom and not the problem. The problem cannot be corrected by nutritional supplements because it contradicts the central law “it is impossible to fight nature and it is very dangerous to be clever with it”. You can correct the problem only by eating freely: fermented grains, meat, fish, goat’s milk products and ripe fruits. Dietary supplements are not absorbed in the same way as they are absorbed from the food we consume and there are hundreds of subtypes and forms of minerals. For example, iron from plants is very partially absorbed compared to iron from animals. Animals that ate grass have much more minerals and vitamins than animals that ate grain and a mixture to make them fat, these are all the animals marketed in supermarkets.

If you eat food that is suitable for humans (based on animal food and fruits mainly) there is no need for nutritional supplements. Most vitamin and mineral deficiency problems are caused by mineral absorption inhibitors (toxins) present in vegetables, leaves, nuts, roots, unripe fruits, mushrooms and leaves. These repellents are designed to prevent animals from eating these plants. Most of the vitamins and minerals we need are found in the meat of animals that ate grass, and in fish from the wild. The minerals that are usually lacking: iodine, iron, B12, zinc, omega 3, Q10 are mostly due to a plant-based diet (seeds, grains, vegetables, leaves, nuts and mushrooms).

In my opinion, nutritional supplements for vitamin D are unnecessary because vitamin D is present in animal fat and from there you should get the little you need. It is true that the body produces vitamin D when exposed to the sun, but most of it is to protect itself from the sun and not to supplement a vitamin D deficiency.

Probiotics are probably completely unnecessary because without the right food for intestinal bacteria they will die and studies have shown that the most important thing is what you eat that will affect the intestinal bacteria.

Most people in the modern world lack iodine due to eating little wild-caught fish (pond fish contain little omega-3 because there is almost no algae in the ponds and the fish get their omega-3 from eating algae). In Israel there is no good test for iodine deficiency and no suitable iodine supplements.

Because of repeated cultivation of the lands and use of chemical substances and identical crops, the quality of the soil is deteriorating and harming the quality of the vegetables and fruits you consume, I don’t eat vegetables at all. The degradation of the soil causes a lack of magnesium, zinc, iodine and more.

Tap water usually lacks essential minerals, so it is better to drink mineral water.

If you are afraid that there are ants, insects, dust, soil and natural things in the food you eat or where you live, be calm, they do not harm us, on the contrary, they even strengthen us, avoiding them causes allergies of all kinds and not diseases as you fear.

Most people lack iodine in the body, and this lack causes problems including: fatigue, constipation and depression. Correcting the deficiency is one of the easiest ways to treat thyroid imbalance. Iodine deficiency results from the repeated use of cultivated and sprayed agricultural lands and the lack of eating seaweed and sea fish.

The recommendations for a certain daily amount of vitamins and minerals (RDA) assume that people on a Western diet, where carbohydrates are the majority of their diet. They are not correct for those who eat food suitable for humans. In animal food and fruits, the absorption of minerals and vitamins is much greater than in plants, and internal organs of meat and fish have the most necessary vitamins and minerals that are difficult to obtain from other sources (liver, brain, heart, etc.).

It is better to mix as little as possible

Separate animal food from plant food (separate fat and protein from carbohydrates). This is how the ancients ate.

Food that looks natural is one of the most dangerous because it is deceptive. For example potato, rice, beans, watermelon, which are not recommended because they are full of lectins. Natural food is not enough, because you have to eat, for example, fruits when they are ripe, as well as some of the vegetables, but because of the extension of their shelf life, they are picked unripe and cooked in unnatural ways so that their natural substance (lectins) that protects them from being eaten prematurely by pests remains in large quantities. Cooking, heating And the fermentation usually lowers the amount of lectins, but not enough. The critical point here is that minors are not good for anyone, but it affects some of us more severely and with different symptoms.

Try not to mix carbohydrates, protein and fat and not to mix any types of food (in nature they do not appear together, only in KFC) – mixing causes heartburn in many people, especially if the fat is vegetable or the toxins of the plant cause heartburn. Note that there is no heartburn when you eat only meat, no matter how much fat it contains.

It is recommended to consume at least one meal without carbohydrates (fruits, bread, cereals, etc.) every day to regulate the mechanism of sugar control and ketones in the body.

Ketones, or ketone bodies, are a type of organic compound that the body produces when it breaks down fat for energy. This usually occurs when there is a shortage of glucose (the main source of energy for cells), such as during fasting, low carbohydrate intake or prolonged exercise. When glucose levels are low, the liver breaks down fatty acids into ketones as an alternative source of energy for the body and brain. There are three main types of ketone bodies: acetoacetate, beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) and acetone.

Ketogenesis, the process of producing ketones, is a normal metabolic response to low glucose availability. However, high ketone levels can be dangerous in certain conditions, such as untreated diabetes. In this case, a life-threatening condition called diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) may occur, requiring immediate medical attention.

The state of ketosis, where ketones are used as the main source of energy, is the basis of a ketogenic diet. These diets are high in fat and low in carbohydrates, and aim to induce and maintain ketosis for weight loss, improved mental focus, and other potential health benefits.

In the past, most meals were without carbohydrates, and today all meals are always with carbohydrates. It’s just a matter of habit.

In the modern diet, consumption of fats and protein with carbohydrates confuses our body systems and sends strong signals to the brain. There is no combination in nature and there never was, so our brain reacts to it in the extreme. In thousands of years of evolution they ate fish and then after a few hours fruit. There was no fish with rice and olive oil with bread in the same meal. The reason lies in the fact that in this mixing both the amount of fat increases and the sugar in the blood increases – a rare phenomenon that the body does not deal with well and a phenomenon that is not accepted in gathering food and hunting! Check yourself with a blood sugar test. When the carbohydrates are processed and the fat is processed and unnatural, the fat and blood sugar rise more to the extremes. This can be confirmed by seeing that diabetics have very high percentages of arteriosclerosis, that is, people with high blood sugar most of the time. In this study you can read about people who live as before and hardly suffer from heart problems in old age. The industrial food companies are targeting this “bug” (chips, pastries, chocolate and adding oil to almost everything). Smoothies and juices are not good for us. The shakes are a distillation of all the sugar from the fruit. We are supposed to chew and are not built for these amounts of fructose when the fruit is liquid. Another thing that supports the fact that our body is not built for carbohydrates together with proteins and fats is: a different ph environment that is needed for the various enzymes to break down carbohydrates versus fats and proteins. The breakdown of fats and proteins requires a higher acidity than the breakdown of carbohydrates – and of course it is impossible to achieve these two values at the same time – read about what acidity each type of enzyme needs here .

Mixing foods also includes drinking water near the food. It is better to drink an hour after eating or an hour before. There are no studies or science on this, so I exercise free thought and assume that the ancients did not have water available all the time and therefore we evolved not to drink while eating. There is logic in reducing acidity by diluting gastric juices.

Why is there no natural alternative to “canned” food today?

In the example of the last 10,000 years since the agricultural revolution, there was a natural choice to deal with the new diet of wheat, milk, roots, etc. but there are also problems. In those years not everyone was exposed to the same food and only in recent years have all humans been exposed to all foods. The white man was not exposed to rice, and the Asians were not exposed to wheat. The blacks were not exposed to wheat and milk and it is indeed seen that they are much more sensitive to milk and fattening than wheat.

A diet that usually kills only after the age of childbearing (such as wheat, legumes, potatoes, smoking, etc.), but causes suffering before that, does not affect evolution, so it is also difficult to understand that it is not adapted to humans. In years gone by, the average age of hunters and gatherers was 40 and that of city dwellers 50, so today’s diseases (which are actually a form of poisoning) seem unrelated to the aforementioned diet. These populations often died from infections and violence rather than from today’s diseases.

Fast only on Yom Kippur

Human evolution has been characterized by many instances of food shortages. Studies indicate that caloric restriction and fasting can lead to increased longevity in animals (Mattson et al., 2017; Mitchell et al., 2016). Humans are also able to survive without food for several weeks, thanks to our adaptive metabolic processes. In some cases, fasting has been shown to help treat certain medical conditions (de Cabo & Mattson, 2019).

However, our body is trained to signal when it needs nutrition and when it does not want to eat, so it is important to pay attention to these cues. Although fasting has several benefits, it may also lead to unnecessary mental distress. For example, fasting for three days to extend life by three days is not a useful trade-off, as it results in three days of starvation.

A more practical approach to optimizing nutrition and health may include implementing an eating window or intermittent fasting (Gabel et al., 2018). This method allows the body to experience short periods of fasting while providing necessary nutrients and avoiding excessive mental stress.

Two meals a day with an eating window of up to ten hours

How many meals are eaten in the tribes

Let’s start from our past, although it is difficult to know exactly how they ate, there are sources of living tribes and it is also possible to use logic and in addition check on ourselves what feels most comfortable to us.

Among some Indian tribes in the plains region, it was customary to eat two large meals a day, one in the morning and one in the evening. This was usually supplemented by smaller snacks throughout the day. This practice was partially influenced by their nomadic lifestyle which was based on hunting and required them to be mobile and flexible in their food intake.

Similarly, some indigenous communities in Africa, such as the Maasai, have a pattern of eating two large meals a day, one in the morning and one in the evening. The Maasai diet traditionally consisted mainly of milk, meat and cattle blood.

The law of the hawk – checking on myself

In the rules for profit there is the “law of the hawk” , when I look at myself, the most comfortable and natural for me is two large meals a day.

I generally eat two meals a day, one at 6 am and another at 2 pm, it’s not exact but usually. Big meals, not small ones, and they will usually include pickled teff bread straight from the oven.

I’ve noticed that when I eat a lot of small meals, I don’t feel alert and energetic, it can’t be ignored.

the science

Studies show that there is an advantage to eating up to 10 hours a day, say from 10 am to 6 pm. Eat 2-3 concentrated meals a day and wait 5-6 hours between meals, of course in concentrated meals. The wait between meals is the time when the stomach empties. In addition, science shows that you should not eat at least two hours before going to bed.

the logic

Think about how they used to eat, do you think they ate all day?

It is important not to eat at least four hours before going to sleep, that way the sleep and digestion will be much better, this is how the ancients also used to do it. Testimony of a person who lived with the Indians in America it is known that they ate 2 meals a day. (My Life Among The Indians – George Catlin). According to his testimony they were magnificently built, upright and happy including white and straight teeth (without toothpaste) lived on buffalo meat, corn and fruit. These are of course the Indians who did not come into contact with modernization. There is also a logical reason, in free thinking we look for the facts with logic, and not just think “Oh, that’s how the Indians ate” – the logic is that when we eat we “injure” the intestines, just like in running when you “injure” muscles and joints, and you need to give them time to heal . The more processed and unnatural the food, the more “injured” they are.

Eating in the window simulates eating in the past, when they were busy getting food and taking care of shelter for the children. From an evolutionary point of view, our bodies are not built to eat all day, and we see this when high sugar levels damage all body systems. Eating throughout the day inevitably means that our sugar will be high all day, especially if we mix carbohydrates, proteins and fats. Here you see again that science connects with logic and observations and then there is beautiful free thought.

Are the parents always to blame?

It is very clear why a convenient diet for parents such as “cornflakes with milk” is popular: it can be prepared at any time, ingredients are preserved in the refrigerator and it is even easy to clean the dishes. Of course, this is not suitable for children and harms their health (unfermented grains and cow’s milk are not suitable for humans).

What has been proven is that each person has the ultimate ability to say no, therefore the only way to make children eat properly is to bring home only food that is suitable for humans.

The body wants to survive today, tomorrow is less interesting

Evolutionarily our body wants to survive in the short term over the long term, therefore the body transports minerals and vitamins to support systems that contribute to short term survival. This means that long range systems are affected first when there is a deficiency of a particular mineral. For example, vitamin K is used for blood clotting and not for the prevention of arterial calcification when there is a lack of it. Research and interview on the subject of Bruce Ames. This nicely explains why diseases start after years of vitamin and mineral deficiencies, many of which are caused by anti-absorption toxins in plants.

Code Name “Dietary Fiber”

You can manage perfectly well without dietary fiber and it is better without. They are not digested and often prevent absorption of minerals. An Inuit diet that is devoid of fiber hardly affects them adversely. Fiber may help those whose diets are poor with toxins from plants and processed foods. There are no studies that show that fiber helps us with anything. This is a folk legend without logical and scientific basis. Foods with a lot of fiber usually contain a lot of anti-nutritional toxins: beans, nuts, grains and more. The dietary fiber in fruits helps moderate the absorption of sugar in the blood, and ripe fruits are indeed adapted for humans.

New materials for a new body?

From an evolutionary point of view it makes sense that certain substances or foods that humans have not been exposed to historically, could be harmful to our health. Our bodies have evolved over thousands of years to adapt to foods that have been available for most of our evolutionary history. Sudden dietary changes caused by agriculture, food processing, and industrialization can challenge our bodies’ ability to efficiently process and metabolize these new substances. Let’s consider fructose, grains and refined oils as examples:

• Fructose: Although fructose is a natural sugar found in fruits, the amount and form of fructose in the modern diet is significantly different from what our ancestors consumed. High fructose corn syrup (HFCS), a highly concentrated form of fructose, has become a common sweetener in processed foods and beverages. Research has linked excessive fructose consumption to metabolic problems, such as insulin resistance, obesity and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (Cohen, L., & Moran, Y., 2017; Softic, S., Cohen, DE, & Kahn, CR, 2016). These health problems may be attributed to the fact that fructose is metabolized mainly in the liver, and excess fructose may overload this organ, leading to harmful metabolic byproducts and fat accumulation.
• Cereals: The agricultural revolution about 10,000 years ago led to the widespread cultivation of cereal grains, which are now a large part of many modern diets. However, this relatively short period in evolutionary terms may not have provided enough time for our digestive systems to fully adapt to grain consumption. For example, gluten, a protein found in wheat and other grains, can trigger autoimmune reactions in susceptible individuals, leading to celiac disease (Lammers, KM, Lu, R., Brownley, J., Lu, B., Gerard, C., Thomas, K ., & Fasano, A., 2008). In addition, some researchers claim that the high carbohydrate content of cereals can contribute to the development of obesity and type 2 diabetes (Cordain, L., Eaton, SB, Sebastian, A., Mann, N., Lindeberg, S., Watkins, BA, & Brand- Miller, J., 2005).
• Refined oils: The industrial production of refined vegetable oils introduced a significant change in the types and ratios of the fatty acids in the modern diet. These oils, such as soybean, corn, and sunflower oil, are rich in omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids. A high ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acids has been associated with increased inflammation and a higher risk of chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease and cancer (Simopoulos, AP, 2002). Our ancestors probably consumed a more balanced ratio of these fatty acids, which would have promoted general health and reduced inflammation.

From an evolutionary perspective, the rapid introduction of new or changing substances such as fructose, grains, and refined oils into the human diet has negative health consequences. Our bodies did not have enough time to adapt to these changes, and as a result, various health problems are caused when these substances are consumed.

This is what I eat

Recommended ancient bread that I eat every day: only plain flour and water. Simmer in a bowl for two to three days. Put in the oven (Ninja 175 degrees is better) for 30 minutes and there is thin bread. After there is sourdough, you don’t have to wait 3 days to mix new flour because the natural yeast is already in the sourdough and does the job in a few hours. After a day outside adding new flour, you should put the bowl in the refrigerator so that there will be no mold. In the washing machine there is a large bowl of leavened dough from which you take dough whenever you want and make fresh bread in 25 minutes.

Breakfasts that I really like: 2-3 plantain bananas in the oven (better in Ninja 25 minutes at 175 degrees), figs and blueberries, goat yogurt with blueberries, tangerines and oranges.

The food is not there and just waiting for you to pick it

Because of the competition for food in nature and the desire of plants to survive there are no situations of food without effort. If there is no effort, one should ask why? Is it toxic?

There is evidence from the archaeological record that early Homo sapiens and its ancestors consumed bone marrow by examining the marks left on bones found at various prehistoric sites. Marks on bones, such as cut marks, percussion marks and fracture patterns, can provide insights into the behaviors of early hominids, including their dietary habits.

Cut marks on bones indicate that stone tools were used to remove meat from the bones, while percussion marks suggest that bones were intentionally broken to access the marrow inside. Bone marrow is a very nutritious food source, rich in fats, vitamins and minerals. Consuming bone marrow was beneficial to early humans as it provided the energy and nutrients needed for survival, brain development and overall growth.

Some examples of archaeological sites with evidence of bone marrow consumption include:

• Swartkrans, South Africa: This site, dating to about 1.8 million years ago, yielded bones with percussion marks, suggesting that early hominids, such as Paranthropus robustus, broke the bones to access bone marrow.
• Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania: This site, dating to about 1.8 million years ago, contains bones with cut and percussion marks, indicating that early Homo species, such as Homo habilis, processed animal carcasses and accessed bone marrow.
• Boxgrove, England: This site, dating to about 500,000 years ago, yielded bones with cut and impact marks, suggesting that early Homo heidelbergensis individuals consumed bone marrow.

These examples demonstrate that early Homo sapiens and their ancestors consumed bone marrow, as evidenced by marks left on bones found at prehistoric sites. This behavior apparently played a significant role in human evolution and provided essential nutrients for survival and development.

The human mind developed before the invention of fire several hundred thousand years ago, it seems logical that eating bone marrow of large animals allowed man to easily eat energetic and easy to chew food without heating but they confused the cause and effect, the reason they ate bone marrow was not because it was nutritious, but because The other animals did not have the opportunity to crack the large bones and man was able to obtain tools to perform the task. Man worked hard to search for carcasses and then crack the bones and get to the bone marrow.

The Mongols lived on meat and milk

The Mongols classified the food into two groups. Ulaan Idee were red foods, like meat, eaten mainly in winter and spring. Tsagaan Idee were white foods, such as dairy products, eaten mainly in summer and autumn. Vegetables were considered a type of grass and called “goat food”. The Mongols were very disgusted that farmers ate plants that grew in dirt and were often fertilized with excrement. Today the life expectancy of the Mongolians (70) is lower than that of the Japanese (80 plus), it makes sense that this is because of the addition of flour, alcohol and smoking which is common in Mongolia and the fact that they do not eat fruit at all.

Maimonides reached beautiful conclusions without today’s knowledge

b A person will never eat, except when he is hungry; And he will not drink, except when he is thirsty.

Incredibly accurate. The body knows how to signal us perfectly.

C (b) A person shall not eat until his stomach is full, but at least as much as a quarter of his fullness. And he shall not drink water in the food, but a little and mixed with wine; And when the food begins to be eaten in his intestines, he drinks what he needs to drink. And he will not drink water much, even when the food is eaten. And he will not eat until he examines himself thoroughly, lest he should be pierced.

You have to eat until you are not hungry. Each person has a different amount, and what is eaten is more important than how much. The part where it is true that it is not good to drink with food, neither before nor after it.

D. A person shall not eat until he walks before eating until his body begins to heat up, or does work, or gets busy with some other occupation. The rule of thumb–his body will respond and he will touch every morning until his body starts to feel warm, and he will rest a little until his mind settles down, and he will eat. And if he bathed in broth after a madman, then that is good; And then stays a little, and eats.

Not true. This is a casual statement without logic and science.

E (c) Never when a person eats, he should sit in his place or lean to the left. And he shall not walk nor ride nor touch nor shake his body nor walk until the food in his intestines is eaten; And anyone who travels after his food or madness, after all, it brings upon himself bad and severe illnesses.

Makes sense, but in my opinion it is inaccurate and not based in science or observations.

and (d) the day and the night, four and twenty hours. It is enough for a person to sleep three hours, which is eight hours; And they will be at the end of the night, so that it will be eight hours from the beginning of his sleep until the sun rises, and he will be found standing from his bed before the sun rises.

Relatively accurate. With age, sleep hours decrease. Tribes had about 7 hours.

7 (e) A person shall not sleep either on his face, or on his back, but on his side – at the beginning of the night on the left side, and at the end of the night on the right side. And he will not sleep close to eating, but will wait after eating for like three or four hours. and will not sleep during the day.

Not true. The preferred sleep is on the back with raised knees. This is how the Indians sleep, it supports the back and breathing through the nose.

8 (f) Things that make the bowels laxative, such as grapes and figs and strawberries and pears and watermelons and the bowels of zucchini and the bowels of cucumbers–a person eats them first, before eating. and will not mix them with the food, but stays a little until they come out of their upper belly; and eat his food. And things that support the bowels, such as pomegranates and apricots and apples and crostamlin–I eat them right away for his food, and he won’t get too much of them.

There are few fruits recommended for eating. What causes diarrhea is certainly not suitable for humans.

9 (7) When a person wants to eat both chicken meat and animal meat, he eats the chicken meat first; as well as eggs and chicken meat, I eat eggs at first; The flesh of a thin animal and the flesh of a coarse animal, I eat first the thin meat: a man will always prefer the light thing first, and the heavy thing later.

Not true. It’s an invention.

10 (8) On hot days–I eat cold foods, and I don’t add too much spice, and I eat the vinegar; And on the rainy days–I eat the stewed food, and a lot of spice, and eat a little of the mustard and the scallions. And in this way, he goes and does in the cold places and in the hot places–in every place and place, according to him.

An invention.

11 (9) There are foods that are extremely bad, and it is proper for a person to never eat them–such as old salted large fish, old salted cheese, truffles and mushrooms, and old salted meat, and wine from its fermentation, and a stew that has been left until its smell has gone, and any food that has a bad smell or Most bitter: after all, these are for the body, like the elixir of death.

Not true. Fish are great to eat, no matter their size. Mushrooms and salt in general are best avoided.

12 And there are foods that are bad, but not like the first ones to be bad; Therefore, it is appropriate for a person not to eat of them except a little and after many days, and not to accustom himself to be fed by them or to eat them with his food always–such as large fish, and cheese and milk that has been milked for four and twenty hours, and the meat of large oxen and large old goats, and beans, lentils, and sapphire, And barley bread, and matzah bread, and the cabbage, the hay, the onions, the garlic, the mustard, and the radish: all these are bad foods.

Partially true. All vegetables, legumes, roots – poisonous to humans. Fermented goat’s milk is good for us. Cow’s milk is very problematic for most people.

13 It is not appropriate for a person to eat of these except a little to very much, and during the rainy days; But not during the rainy days, he will not eat from them at all. And the beans and lentils alone – it is not appropriate to eat them, neither on hot days nor on rainy days. And the Deloin, I will eat a little of them on hot days.

An invention.

10. And there are foods that are bad, and not like these; And they are the waterfowl, and the little doves, and the dates, and bread toasted in oil or bread that has been soaked in oil, and the semolina that has been sifted until there is no more smell left in it, and the stock and the morais. It is not proper to eat too much of these; And a person who is wise and conquers his desire, and will not follow his lust and will not eat anything of all the mentioned, unless we consume them for medicine–that is a hero.

Partially true. The water fowl and pigeons are great for us.

15 (11) A person should never deprive himself of the fruits of the ilana, and not eat much of them even dry, and we should not say wet; But before all their needs are cooked, they are like swords to the body. And the carobs, bad for the world. And the chutney fruits are bad, and no one eats them but a little in the hot days and in the chummin places. And the figs and the grapes and the almonds are good for the world, whether wet or dry, and a person eats from them all he needs; But eating them will not last, even though they are better than all the fruits of the wild.

Partially true. Almonds are very poisonous to us.

16 (12) Honey and wine, bad for the young and good for the old, and especially during the rainy days. And a person should eat on hot days, two thirds of what he eats on rainy days.

Honey is good for us. Wine is not good for us.

17 (13) A person will always strive to have a loose bowel all his days, and he will be close to a little diarrhea. And this is a great rule in medicine–that as long as the bad is avoided or comes out with difficulty, many patients come.

Far from true. vice versa. He probably suffered from something close to diarrhea because of the vegetables he ate. Should be hard. Science supports this.

18 And why would a man loose his stomach, if we exerted a little – if he was a young man – he would eat in the morning salty loaves seasoned with oil and morice and salt, without a mouthful; Or he will drink water from a turnip or cabbage shellac with oil and salt and spices. And if he was old – he would drink honey mixed with water in the morning, and he would wait for about four hours, and then he would eat his meal. He will do this day after day, three or four days if necessary, until his stomach burns.

An invention. Vegetable oil is really toxic to us.

19 (yd) and another rule they said in the creation of the body: As long as a person exercises and touches a lot and is not full, and his bowels are relaxed – no illness comes to him and his strength is strengthened, even if he eats the foods of the bad; (10) And whoever sits for sure and does not exercise, or whoever pauses his piercings or whose hearing is hard – even if he eats good foods and keeps himself according to medicine, all his days will be in pain and his strength will fail. And rough eating is like the elixir of death for every person’s body, and it is a staple for all sick people.

An invention.

Most of the illnesses that come to a person are only from bad foods, or because he fills his stomach and eats coarse food, even from good foods. He who Solomon says in his wisdom, “guards his mouth and his tongue–guards his soul from trouble” (Proverbs 11:23)–that is, he guards his mouth from eating bad food or from swearing, and his tongue from speaking except in his needs.

Most illnesses originate from eating food that is not suitable for humans. This is the right part.

16 (16) The way of bathing–that a person enters the bath from seven days to seven days; And he will not enter near eating and not when he is hungry, but when the food begins to digest. And he bathes his whole body in broth that does not burn the body, and only his head in broth that burns the body in. And then he will bathe his body in fusharin, and then in fusharin from the fusharin, until he bathes in the cold; And he will not pass over his head at all, neither lukewarm nor cold. And he will not bathe in the cold, on rainy days. And he will not bathe until he sweats and his whole body is exhausted, and he will not take a long time in the bath; But when he sweats and his body becomes stiff, he will wash off and leave.

Partially true. A cold shower is good for us. Science and logic support this.

A meal on the shoulders of giants

The first way that seemed very logical to me was Esther Gohkel’s , who even wrote about correct posture, but she solved it by looking at how the ancients sat and stood, and this was something I hadn’t thought of, but he was also a genius for solving what we are supposed to eat, what is right for us In general – to look at what the ancients ate and how they behaved and moved, not to copy everything but to use logic and copy what is good for us.

The book that explained to me that there might be a problem with wheat after it didn’t seem logical to me that only some people are sensitive to gluten is “Wheat Stomach” by Doctor William David, I listened to it on Audible and it is also available in Hebrew.

Another book that explains the science behind fat and meat is “The Big Bluff of Cholesterol” through which we understand that animal fat is actually good for us and not plant fat and it connects to what the ancients used to eat, when there is a crossover between logic and science and historical observation then there is a crack.

When I told about these books to my cousin from the USA, he told me about a good book called “The Paradox of the Plants” by a heart surgeon from the USA. It was really a breakthrough. Gendry said that there are all kinds of toxins in all kinds of roots, leaves and even plant things So that we don’t eat them. Gendry’s mistake was that he said that some plants have it in a problematic way, but the truth is that all plants have it, he was really groundbreaking, but the book’s recommendation should have been to avoid plant food altogether except for ripe and sour fruits, The soaking and sprouting that significantly reduce the toxins of which one family is the lactans.

It was crazy surprising but when I researched the toxins I found out he was right, when I took plants off my menu the annoying little stomach aches I had were completely gone. Poof they are gone. Then there was an amazing combination of science, with logic and a personal experiment on myself, there is cracking in a free diet. After that I came across a lecture by a really smart doctor from Australia, Paul Mason , who like me goes with what is right and not with the current, he explains in a scientific way what effects plant toxins do to our body. His way is different from mine because it is based only on science without much logic and evolution, I combine everything even though I am weak in biological science, but I do know how to recognize wise men like Paul, who excelled at a eucharistic university in Australia, and yes, these things are important and say a lot.

In every book I’ve read, a lecture from the internet, usually 70% true and 30% false, it requires a serious diagnosis to take from each book what is true, and that’s how I put together Free Nutrition.

Nice check for food

Is it possible to eat the food without cooking, heating or using a chemical process on it without it being bitter, sour or spicy?

If the answer is yes, then it is a “free” food and suitable for humans!

Of course, eating them cooked is better, but this is only to check if the food is suitable for humans. This does not mean not to eat the other foods. It’s just a tool that clarifies what is suitable for us. Humans began using fire in the last few hundred thousand years compared to several million years of evolution, if a certain food cannot be eaten without cooking or heating it means that it entered our diet “recently” such as bread, plants and the like.

• All types of meat can be eaten raw – therefore suitable for humans.
• Ripe fruits – no action needs to be taken, therefore suitable for humans.
• Fish – moving fish are edible, therefore suitable for humans.
• Cereals – you can’t eat them without cooking or baking. therefore not suitable for humans.
• Leaves – bitter or sour, therefore not suitable for humans.
• Nuts – usually somewhat bitter, therefore not suitable for humans.
• Legumes – hard and bitter without cooking and also toxic, therefore not suitable for humans.
• Milk – you can drink milk straight from the goat, therefore suitable for humans. Also cow’s milk, but many people are sensitive to it because of its difference from the milk they have been drinking for thousands of years.
• Vegetables – most are uncooked bitter or spicy, not suitable for humans.